Supplement Studies  /  evidence, scored
Evidence File 034 · NMN · Method v0.14 of 4 claims researched

NMNNicotinamide mononucleotide · 4 claims

The biomarker moves reliably. Almost nothing downstream of it does, and the trials are far too short to speak to ageing at all.

4Claims scored
5Sources
150–1200 mgStudied dose
Jul 26Reviewed

Claim 01


Raises blood NAD+ levels
6.2/10
Moderate·Reliable · but this is the marker, not the goal

Random-effects meta-analysis across 12 studies and 513 participants found an overall significant effect of NMN in elevating blood NAD levels. This part of the story is solid and consistently replicated.

It is also the entire mechanistic premise of the category. Whether raising the marker produces anything a person would notice is the subject of every claim below.

The working

6Quantity
6Quality
8Consistency
4Directness

(6 × 0.25) + (6 × 0.35) + (8 × 0.25) + (4 × 0.15) = 6.2
Directness scores 4. Nobody takes NMN because they want a number in a blood tube to change.

Claim 02


Improves glucose and lipid metabolism
4.0/10
Weak·Marker up, outcomes flat

The same meta-analysis that confirmed NAD elevation reported the rest plainly: “most of the clinically relevant outcomes were not significantly different between NMN supplementation and control group.” That covers fasting glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL-C and HDL-C.

This is the cleanest biomarker-outcome dissociation on the site. The mechanism works exactly as advertised and the consequences do not follow.

The working

2Quantity
5Quality
2Consistency
8Directness

(2 × 0.25) + (5 × 0.35) + (2 × 0.25) + (8 × 0.15) = 4.0
Scored as support for the claim. The trials were adequate; the clinically relevant outcomes did not move.

Claim 03


Improves physical performance
4.6/10
Emerging·10 studies · 437 patients · short follow-up

A PRISMA-guided systematic review identified 10 randomised trials covering 437 patients, mean age 58, with a mean follow-up of 9.6 weeks and doses from 150 to 1,200 mg/day.

A separate meta-analysis of NMN and nicotinamide riboside against skeletal muscle index, handgrip strength and gait speed in adults over 60 concluded that evidence on their effects in older adults remains inconclusive.

The working

4Quantity
4Quality
4Consistency
8Directness

(4 × 0.25) + (4 × 0.35) + (4 × 0.25) + (8 × 0.15) = 4.6
A small, short, heterogeneous evidence base. Enough to justify further trials, not enough to justify the marketing.

Claim 04


Slows biological ageing
2.1/10
Evidence against·No trial has run long enough to test it

The longest NMN trials run twelve weeks. The claim is about decades. There is no human trial in existence with the duration or the endpoints to test it, and the score reflects the absence of evidence rather than evidence of absence.

The mechanistic case rests substantially on rodent work. The next page, on nicotinamide riboside, deals with how well that has translated.

The working

1Quantity
3Quality
2Consistency
2Directness

(1 × 0.25) + (3 × 0.35) + (2 × 0.25) + (2 × 0.15) = 2.1
Directness scores 2. A 4-to-12-week trial measuring handgrip strength cannot address a claim about the rate of ageing, whatever it finds.

Dosage as studied


Most-studied regimen
150–1200 mg per day in trials

Trial durations ranged from 4 to 12 weeks — a window that cannot address claims about ageing.

Studied range
150 to 1,200 mg/day across randomised trials.
Trial duration
Mean follow-up 9.6 weeks, range 4 to 12 weeks, in the physical performance review.
Population
Mean age 58 years, range 35 to 81, across 437 participants.
Regulatory note
NMN’s status as a permissible dietary supplement ingredient has been contested in the US. Check current status in your market before relying on availability.